The Next Evolution in Streaming Depends on Distribution
The proliferation of video streaming platforms in recent years has been a net positive for consumers, providing them with a wealth of content options and frequently, multiple ways to watch the content. However, for content owners, the desire to reach their own distinct audiences means forming relationships with many traditional broadcast and streaming platforms, which introduces new and complex challenges related to content delivery to each of these distributors.
Traditionally, a content owner relied on "Meet Me Rooms" inside "Carrier Hotels" to reliably distribute single versions of their content to a vast network of linear broadcast affiliates. In the modern streaming ecosystem, the content owner often must now deliver the content to numerous streaming platforms while modifying the content in each case to meet the tangled web of unique needs associated with distributing their content on each streaming platform.
Whether a major tech giant or a platform that serves a more niche audience, each streaming partner has specific requirements for receiving live content from content owners, from graphics and closed captioning to ad markers and specific codecs. They require unique forms of redundant delivery to their networks, have individual methods for communicating schedules and schedule changes, handle reporting and analytics in unique ways, and have unique video operations workflows for managing the content on their platform.
None of these streaming platforms are wrong to have unique needs, but this creates a burden on the content owners who must custom-build a video distribution network to support each unique streaming platform’s requirements in order to maximize audience reach. It is a significant investment in equipment and staff, is prone to failure in a live environment, and does not scale well for organizations attempting to expand their global footprint.
In delivering content to streaming platforms, content owners take on the constant work of managing these disparate connections, which diverts valuable time and resources away from core business goals, such as audience growth and content innovation. This fragmented and manually intensive model acts as a silent tax on an organization’s operational budget, limiting their ability to tap into new markets and revenue streams. As the landscape continues to fragment, and adding additional distribution partners becomes even more critical to maximize reach, the need for a simplified, centralized solution is no longer a luxury but an industry imperative.
The Weight of Responsibility
Today, the burden of navigating the tangle of tools and services needed to condition and deliver streams to the final distributors falls primarily on content owners. It fundamentally stifles innovation and agility. When a content team's resources are perpetually tied up in setting up, checking, and managing a patchwork of feeds while troubleshooting technical glitches, they have less capacity to focus on what truly drives fan engagement: creating compelling content.
Imagine a league that wants to experiment with a new interactive viewing experience, or a team that wants to launch a new, hyper-localized broadcast for a specific region. The operational complexities of ensuring this new content reaches every single one of their distribution partners, each with their own set of requirements, can make such initiatives logistically daunting, if not impossible. This operational drag becomes a significant barrier to entry for creative, forward-thinking projects.
The current approach also puts immense pressure on a content owner's ability to maintain a consistent brand experience. Each distributor may have different latency, quality, or even graphical overlay requirements. Ensuring that a live broadcast, with all its on-the-fly updates, such as real-time stats and sponsored graphics, looks perfect and performs flawlessly across every platform is a monumental task. A failure on one platform, even if it's due to a misconfiguration or a technical hiccup on their end, can still reflect poorly on the content owner and their brand. In a world where consumers expect a seamless, high-definition experience on every device, this inconsistency can erode trust and diminish the perceived value of the content itself.
A Call to Action for a Simplified Future
The solution to this expanding technical and operational mess is not to abandon the multi-platform streaming strategy to reach all fans, but to simplify the underlying infrastructure. The industry used a centralized video distribution system for linear broadcasts, and it should do the same in support of digital streaming platforms, albeit with the ability to replicate and condition every feed needed to support the unique needs of each digital streaming platform.
This centralized digital video “Meet Me Room” would act as a single point of entry for content owners, taking in their primary live feed and then automatically transforming it to meet the specific needs of each downstream partner. But to truly scale, it must be purely a cloud-based solution. It is only very recently that the full functionality of a Master Control Room (MCR) can be delivered efficiently and reliably in the cloud, which allows for this new centralized digital video “Meet Me Room” to exist.
In this new simplified future, content owners will no longer need to manage dozens of individual connections and feeds to streaming platforms. They would manage just one. They would not need to originate their feed through satellites - they could digitally deliver the content to a digital Meet Me Room which could serve both linear broadcaster affiliates and streaming platforms.
This hub would handle the complex, granular requirements: transcoding to the right codec, adding specific ad markers, inserting the correct closed captioning formats, and even managing regional blackouts or rights restrictions. This delivery model would eliminate the need for redundant infrastructure and the constant, manual intervention that currently defines the process.
It also provides for a unified framework to monitor each feed for quality, would allow for high-speed and efficient failovers in the event of a specific problem, and could address piracy by adding watermarks to every single video in a consistent way The industry must find a way to create a more streamlined and automated system that can efficiently deliver content to each distributor where and in the format they want on behalf of content owners.
The consequences of inaction are clear: a continued reliance on manual, unscalable workflows will not only impede revenue growth and global expansion but will also put the integrity of the live viewing experience at risk. Creative organizations that are able to find cost-effective ways to efficiently deliver content and seamlessly add new distribution partners will be able to maximize both reach and revenue. The time to solve this challenge is now. The future of streaming depends on it.
[Editor's note: This is a contributed article from Kiswe. Streaming Media accepts vendor bylines based solely on their value to our readers.]
Related Articles
Casey Saran, CEO of Spaceback, challenges advertisers to think about the next wave of TV advertising innovation coming their way in 2025. Especially as GenZ moves into adulthood, they'll bring their social habits with them, and their expectations for personalized, interactive experiences.
30 Jan 2025
With advances with generative AI, just-intime transcoding, SSAI stitching, and other streaming video tech stack components, companies like Infuse Video are demonstrating that the true vision of video personalization—changing the video content itself—is finally at hand.
04 Oct 2023
If you're delivering a live video stream, you likely want to publish it on as many platforms as possible. Here's the best hardware and software to pull it off.
04 Aug 2017