Sisvel Launches Patent Pools for VP9 and AV1
Luxembourg-based Sisvel International S.A. announced two new patent pools today offering licenses on patents "relevant to the VP9 and AV1 specifications." The pools apply solely to "consumer display devices," like smartphones, computers, and TVs, and "consumer non-display devices," like set-top-boxes, dongles, and graphics cards. The standard rate for VP9 is € 0.24 for display devices and € 0.08 for non-display devices, while AV1 is € 0.32 and € 0.11 respectively.
Regarding content, the Sisvel website states "The licenses offered by Sisvel do not cover: content on physical digital media storage or non-physical content distribution." This seems to indicate that there is no intent to claim royalties on encoded content, but it’s not 100% clear that royalties won’t be pursued under this or another license.
Here’s the press release for the pools, and here are the licensing terms.
I spoke with intellectual property attorney David Long, editor of the Essential Patent Blog. He was not familiar with the announcement but agreed to answer general questions about new pools. In general, he said that most companies shipping technology products understand that their products may infringe upon third-party IP, so the formation of these pools shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone designing AV1 or VP9 encode or decode into their products. He recommended that companies shipping products that may be covered by the pools start performing due diligence to determine if their products infringe upon these patents.
Unified Patents is a membership organization that has aggressively contested patent abuse and recently challenged the validity of 29% of the HEVC-related patents in the Velos Media HEVC pool. Commenting on the Sisvel announcement, Unified Patents CEO Kevin Jakel said, "We continue to be concerned with the lack of transparency in these licensing programs. Sisvel publishes its pricing for VP9 and AV1, but not how it came about with this price. They also have not provided a public list or even number of patents which they consider essential. It makes it very hard for anyone to ascertain how relevant the patents are and how to value them. This creates uncertainty for companies deploying technology which we think is negative for everyone."
We sent a list of questions to Sisvel, including regarding content royalties, but received no response as of late Wednesday. We also reached out to Google and the Alliance for Open Media, but received no response. We’ll update this article if and when any of these parties respond.
H.264 still leads the pack, says JW Player's CTO Dave LaPalomento, but for more sophisticated publishers, VP9 offers benefits including bandwidth savings.
Sisvel's Video Codec Licensing Platform will employ a "committed volume scheme" rather than a royalty cap, according to CEO Mattia Fogliacco, who did not rule out royalties on software-based encoding
The first tests of AV1 showed glacial encoding times that seriously detracted from the codec's usability. But since then encoding times have improved enough that AV1 is almost usable—and we've got the charts to prove it.
The SEP Video Codec Zone also will provide companies targeted by HEVC IP owners with unique data and tools to negotiate fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory licenses
Ahead of Streaming Media West, a meeting of codec experts offers new developments in leading-edge codecs, as well as field reports from companies already using them.
Today the Alliance for Open Media froze the AV1 bitstream and released an unoptimized software encoder and decoder; AV1 decode should arrive in several browsers and some content from member companies over the next few months, with hardware implementations in about a year.