Video: The Pros and Cons of a Multi-CDN Strategy
Until recently, using multiple CDNs to deliver content was something rarely done by content owners spending less than $1 million per year on content services. But more recently, content owners spending $200,000-$250,000 per year have been increasingly exploring the multi-CDN strategy. Cedexis reports that between May 2015 and May 2016, 26% of their customers used multiple CDNs. In this clip from Content Delivery Summit 2016, Streaming Media EVP Dan Rayburn discusses this trend, and why more tier two content owners are moving in this direction.
Read the full transcript:
Dan Rayburn: I've been really surprised over the last 12 months just how many smaller customers, what I'll call Tier-Two customers, have moved to a multi-CDN strategy. A multi-CDN strategy is where a customer decides to use two or more CDNs and they split their traffic across them, and typically industry-wide, we saw that for only the largest customers. If you were spending $1 million more a year on CDN services, you'd think about a Multi-CDN approach. I'm now seeing customers who are spending $200,000-$250,000 a year in total using 2 or 3 CDNs.
I asked Cedexis to look this up, since they track CDNs. They saw here that over the last 12 months, 26% of their customer base has been using multi-CDN. That's pretty high, especially being that these are Tier Two-size customers. Multi-CDN is definitely something that's been happening more and more of late, which really surprised me, to be honest, and every time I do the survey each year, I see more customers selecting more than one CDN, as far as who they're choosing.
What's the impact? Why do you care? If you're a customer, the impact is easy. It shows you that there's many right ways to deliver content with good performance. There's not only one network topology that works, or you have to be doing it this way, or using this type of technology. Customers realize that multiple CDNs have very similar levels of performance, and different price points, and different SLEs, so it makes sense that you would use more than one CDN.
For other customers, it doesn't make sense, because you don't want to get raw logs from 2 different places. You don't want to have different types of metrics. You don't want to deal with 2 different types of contracts. If you use 2 different CDNs, you can't bundle all your bandwidth into 1 contract, so it's not a right or wrong answer if you use multi-CDN. It's a matter of what you're comfortable with and what the purpose is of doing it.
Ensure your viewers get the best experience possible. A multi-CDN strategy adds robustness that makes streams more successful. Here's what customers need to know when looking for providers.
When 1 or 2 CDNs isn't good enough, how about 15? Video delivery company Peer5 introduced multi-CDN with participation from 15 content delivery networks.
Conviva's Ed Haslam explains how measuring your users' quality of experience (QoE) and strategizing based on experience metrics can grow video-driven ad revenue.
Streaming Media EVP Dan Rayburn discusses the shifting emphasis in the CDN market from delivering bits to providing a complete ecosystem.
Plex's Greg Edmiston, HBO's John Narus, and Machinima's James Glasscock discuss the challenges of controlling and standardizing the user/viewer experience across the diverse device landscape.
Ooyala analyst Jim O'Neill and Machinima SVP James Glasscock discuss why content owners and broadcasters are recognizing the need to get on board with OTT in the face of cord-cutting.
V-Factor Technologies' Jeremy Bennington explains how content providers can monitor live video delivery in real time and ensure consistent quality across different encoding profiles.
Vimeo's Anjali Sud, StreamVPG's Scott Farb, and CME Group's Scott Szczurek discuss the latest marketing and branding content creation trends at Streaming Media East 2016.
Vimeo VP of Platform Marketing Anjali Sud discusses successful (and not-so-successful) strategies for building branding campaigns with on-demand online video.
Wowza's Ryan Jespersen outlines the workflow for streaming live 360° and virtual reality video from capture to ingest to stitching to delivery.
MP & Silva's William Mao discusses the pros and cons of opting for an ad-based VOD model vs. building a subscription service.
Frost & Sullivan's Avni Rambhia discusses issues with latency, bandwidth, user experience, encoding, reach, and quality facing content creators as they make the leap into live VR.
Streamroot's Erica Beavers makes the case for adaptive bitrate streaming and explains how to deliver the best possible user experience via ABR encoding.
Panelists from NBC, Flix, and comScore discuss which OTT business models will and won't work going forward, and whether or not you need scale to be successful.
Google's Serge Kassardjian, Whistle Sports' Brian Selander, and Recurly's Dan Burkhart discuss the challenges of differentiation in the OTT services market.
RLJ Entertainment's Titus Bicknell describes how Acorn TV used an innovative strategy for adapting long-tail marketing to identify revenue streams in a broader assortment of niche content markets.
Should you be delivering HEVC? It depends on what you're delivering and who you're trying to reach. Frost & Sullivan analyst Avni Rambhia breaks down the key issues of sticking with AVC vs. migrating to HEVC in this clip from Streaming Media East 2016.
Panelists from Streaming Media, Beamr, Brightcove, Verizon, and Yahoo! discuss the balance between encoding quality and bandwidth at Streaming Media East 2016.
Twitter Manager of Content Strategy and Planning Nina Mishkin provides 3 strategic tips on how to leverage Twitter to get your videos seen, expand your reach, and grow your brand.
Once you've decided on the bitrates that you want to deliver, it's time to determine the best resolution for each one, from 360p on up to 1080p. Streaming Learning Center's Jan Ozer shows you how.
Streaming Learning Center's Jan Ozer explains how to choose data rates and resolutions for adaptive bitrate streaming to most effectively meet client expectations and end-user needs.