Save your seat for Streaming Media NYC this May. Register Now!

Video: The Case for Custom Encoding, Part 1: Bitrate

Following the model established by Netflix in December 2015, Jan Ozer argues against content providers applying a standard encoding ladder to all of their content because of the inefficiencies and waste that approach builds into the process. In Part 1 of this 2-part series, he outlines his process for handling the custom bitrate side of the equation from mobile on up; in Part 2 he deals with resolution.

Learn more about per-title encoding at Streaming Media East.

Read the complete transcript of Ozer's remarks in this clip:

Jan Ozer: In December 2015, Netflix came out with per title encoding. They said, "We're no longer going to use a standard encoding ladder for all of our videos because it's inefficient." An encoding ladder is good for one video. For low-motion videos it's probably too high a data rate. For high-motion videos it's probably too low a data rate. They said, "We're not going to use one any more. We're going to use a custom encoding ladder for each video that we encode and distribute."

This is what I go through with my clients. It's what I go through with my own videos. 

When I'm creating an encoding ladder I choose the lowest rate for mobile. I say, "How low do I want to go?" Then I choose the highest supported data rate, and that's a cost issue. How much can my monetization support from a cost perspective? Then I choose a data rate of around three megabits per second. I want that to be a pretty high-quality stream because if you look at the Netflix publishes and ISP index every month, and if you look at the average sustainable stream for most of their ISPs that they report on, it's typically between 3.8 and 3.2 megabits per second. I want a stream that's going to look good at that rate.

Then I fill in the blanks going between 150% and 200%. If I started at 200 kilobits per second, that's my low stream, 4.6 megabits per second, that might be my high stream. This is the target for the high sustainable throughput, this guy over here. Then I run the numbers backwards. This is 200 and something percent, this is 200%, this is 1.6. This is around 1.33, this is around 1.5, and this is around 1.5 as well. This is nothing magical, but that's the process I go through.

Streaming Covers
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues
Related Articles

When it Comes to Bitrates, Less is Always More

What can streaming producers do in the short-term to reduce the load during these COVID-19-related bandwidth usage spikes?

Video: Best Practices for Live Encoding

Brightcove's Matt Smith explains how to meet the challenges of live event streaming from technical to QA to process issues to securing bandwidth in this presentation from Live Streaming Summit.

Video: What's the Best Way to Test Video Encoding Quality?

Streaming Learning Center's Jan Ozer compares four approaches to testing video compression quality in this clip from Streaming Media East.

Video: Is 4K Quality Worth the Higher Data Rate?

Twitch Video Systems Engineer Tarek Amara discusses the pros and cons of transitioning to 4K streaming, and underscores the heightened importance of high-quality compression in delivering a successful 4K experience.

Video: The Case for Custom Encoding, Part 2: Resolution

Streaming Learning Center's Jan Ozer makes the case for custom, per-title encoding on the Netflix model, focusing on resolution issues in part 1 of this 2-part series from his Streaming Media West presentation.