Save your FREE seat for Streaming Media Connect this August. Register Now!

The HEVC Soap Opera: Keeping Track of Players and Costs

Article Featured Image

If you write soap operas or reality TV programs for a living, you should check out the activities of the HEVC IP owners for inspiration. Since HEVC’s inception, we’ve had two new pools, a breakup (Technicolor from HEVC Advance), and now one patent owner, Samsung, that joined the HEVC Advance pool while still a member of MPEG LA. Take away the beaches and the bods, and Survivor really has nothing on these HEVC IP owners.

Let’s start with Samsung. On April 5, HEVC Advance announced that “Samsung has become both a Licensor and Licensee of the HEVC Advance HEVC/H.265 Licensing Program. As a Licensor, Samsung will make its essential patents available through the HEVC Advance patent pool, which provides a transparent and efficient licensing program for HEVC/H.265 essential patents.”

There’s just one problem: Samsung was and continues to be a member of the MPEG LA pool. According to someone familiar with the terms of MPEG LA’s HEVC License, “an HEVC Licensor’s sublicense grant to MPEG LA is nonexclusive. While an HEVC Licensor may not voluntarily terminate MPEG LA’s HEVC program as Licensor or Licensee before January 1, 2020 (and any MPEG LA Licensees as of such date would continue to be covered under the terminating Licensor’s patents in any case), nothing precludes a Licensor from licensing its HEVC essential patents bilaterally or through other means. Regardless, royalties payable by Licensees under MPEG LA’s HEVC License are not affected; they are the same whether one or more patents is used. And in fact, Samsung continues as both Licensor and Licensee to MPEG LA’s HEVC program.”

At first glance, this would seem to mean that you’d be paying for the Samsung portfolio twice, but that isn’t the case. According to the IP-Watchdog website, a principle called pre-netting dictates that, “in cases where licensees hold pre-existing patent licenses with patent pool licensors, pre-netting subtracts what would be due the licensors when calculating royalty payments. This step ensures that licensees pay only for what they use and encourages broader participation in the pool.”

So if you license from MPEG LA first, you should be entitled to pre-netting from HEVC Advance, and vice versa. By my count, Samsung has about 1,150 of the more than 3,300 patents listed by MPEG LA on its site, obviously a substantial number. Before adding the Samsung patents, HEVC Advance had 951 patents, so Samsung will represent a substantial number there as well. So pre-netting should result in significant cost savings, though it will be interesting to learn if this process goes as smoothly as it sounds.

The other news is the formation of a patent pool by Velos Media, representing “the entire portfolio of HEVC standard-essential patents from Ericsson, Panasonic, Qualcomm, Sharp, and Sony.” Although royalty pricing hasn’t been set, the Velos website says, “Between them, these companies represent more adopted contributions to the HEVC standard than any other individual company or joint licensing program.” If Velos’ IP owners really believe their own valuation statements, then HEVC licensees could be looking at another $40 million royalty cap, if there’s a cap at all, and those publishing HEVC content could face a new set of fears about potential royalties. That’s on top of the $60 million+ already in place, plus the $9.75 million+ many are paying for H.264. All this is before any royalty imposed by Technicolor, which also has not published its rates. While the Velos group appears to incorporate the last of the HEVC IP holdouts (which is a good thing), the total cost for HEVC could be over $100 million/year. According to patent attorney David W. Long, these IP owners maybe be able to claim royalties for up to 6 years prior to the date a lawsuit is filed.

Meanwhile, the Alliance for Open Media’s AV1 seems to be surging, fresh off Bitmovin’s live AV1 encoding/decoding demonstration at NAB. Given how hard HEVC IP owners are working to make their technology commercially unpalatable, I wouldn’t be surprised if Bitmovin had the most crowded booth in the show.

[This article appears in the June 2017 issue of Streaming Media Magazine as "The HEVC Soap Opera."]

Streaming Covers
for qualified subscribers
Subscribe Now Current Issue Past Issues
Related Articles

Divideon Creates xvc, an HEVC Codec With Reasonable Pricing

The surprise royalty payments on HEVC have some publishers looking for alternatives. Learn how one company created a better codec price plan.

Is Apple's Move to HEVC About Effectiveness or Efficiency?

The latest macOS includes support for HEVC, but not for older Macs. In the rush to support higher resolutions and lower files sizes, are too many people being left out?

Infographic: The OTT Takeover

Why the move to HDR matters for more than just 4K—and why OTT services and devices are going to lead the way

Apple HEVC Move Means Higher Encoding Costs

Hardware acceleration and field programmable gate arrays may be the answer to the rising costs of encoding for multiple codecs including H.264, H.265, VP9, and soon AV1

Apple Embraces HEVC: What Does it Mean for Encoding?

At its Worldwide Developer Conference this week, Apple announced it would support HEVC/H.265 in High Sierra and iOS 11 in a combination of hardware and software decoding, depending on the device. Here are the details of how Apple will implement it.

HEVC Advance Makes Some Software Royalty Free

HEVC Advance says it hopes to speed the adoption of HEVC decoders among the installed base of computers and devices by making some software downloads royalty free

It's Time to Move Forward with HEVC

Speedy adoption of HEVC has been delayed by squabbles over licensing. Here, the developers of x265 propose steps to end the gridlock and move forward.

Companies and Suppliers Mentioned