Streaming Media

Streaming Media on Facebook Streaming Media on Twitter Streaming Media on LinkedIn
 

Benchmark Tests: Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 vs. Apple Final Cut Pro X

There have been lots of comparisons between Final Cut Pro X and Premiere Pro CS6, with most focusing on features and workflows. This article discusses a series of multiple-format benchmark tests that analyzed comparative performance between the two programs.

XDCAM EX Tests

This footage used in this test came courtesy of NVIDIA, delivered with a reviewer's guide for their GPU technology. The first test involved a straight render of one minute of XDCAM EX 1080p 23.976 fps footage, with color and brightness correction applied, as well as a sharpen effect. All these effects were applied to all clips in these three tests.

For the second test, I placed shots of a music video side by side, while the third shows four videos, each in their respective quadrants (Figure 4, below). To render the footage from all these tests, I used a 23.976 fps export preset in both programs.

benchmark4

Figure 4. The Betacam EX footage I gleaned from an NVIDIA reviewers' kit.

Table 3 (below) tells the tale. Most scaling activities, as well as all applied effects, are GPU accelerated, which likely is the reason that CS6's comparative performance increased with scene complexity, as we saw with the DSLR footage in Table 1. With the video wall project, you would save well over two hours of rendering time.

benchmark_table3

Table 3. Sony XDCAM EX results. 

JVC GY-HM700U

The video used in this test was part of a ballet audition DVD that I produced for the dancer. I shot in 720p60 mode with a JVC GY-HM700U, which encodes into H.264 format and stores the video in an MPEG-2 wrapper which both programs edit natively.

In the first test, I encoded the color corrected footage with a simple lower-third title overlay (Figure 5, below). The second test involved a Gaussian blur filter that changed value over the 1-minute clip, starting at 0 and finishing at 10.

benchmark5

Figure 5. Footage from the JVC GY-HM700U.

Table 4 (below) shows a significant advantage in the single stream project that increases with project complexity.

benchmark_table4

Table 4. Results using H.264-encoded footage from the JVC GY-HD700U. 

Related Articles
The new version of Adobe Media Encoder, included in the just-released CS6 collection as well as as a standalone product, offers significant improvements in usability and performance, as well as new features. Here's what you need to know about it.
Jan Ozer sits down with Bill Roberts to discuss the trends impacting the future direction of Adobe Creative Suite for video pros, including the decline of 3D, the rise of 4K, and second-screen viewing. Other topics included the growth of Creative Cloud, and the development arc of Apple Final Cut Pro X.
Adobe Premiere Pro Instructor extraordinaire Luisa Winters explains how to use the new and enhanced Multi-Camera Monitor for quick and efficient multicam edits in Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 in this video and text tutorial.
Video encoding and editing expert Jan Ozer provides three useful tips that will enhance your workflow and get you out of some editing jams in your Adobe Premiere Pro projects: editing audio without unlinking; Fill Left and Fill Right to create stereo audio; and creating nested sequences for smoother edits and creating reusable set pieces in your projects.
In this tutorial you'll learn how to maximize the brightness and contrast of your video in Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 using the Brightness, Contrast, and Gamma Correction controls for effective and balanced adjustments.
Two types of noises degrade the audio you shoot with your video: random noises like microphone clicks and pops, and consistent noises like white noise or air conditioning hum. This tutorial demonstrates how to remove both of them in Adobe Audition CS6.
Background noise and pops and clicks in audio are an unfortunate fact of life for many productions. In this tutorial we'll explore some fixes you can try in Final Cut Pro X.